|
Anwar Shaikh reviews Baljit
Rai's book:
Is India Going Islamic ? |
It is a small book of 128 pages, modestly priced
at Rs. 125, but, in terms of subject matter, it commands a high value owing to
the significance of the report that it presents to the Hindu nation.
Mr. Baljit Rai, a well-known Indian patriot, shows his
anguish about the future of his motherland in a way which is masterly in
description, and moving and masticating in effect.
He is troubled by two factors - proxy war waged by
Pakistan in Kashmir, and massive infiltration of the Bangladeshi Muslims into
adjoining states of India where they are changing the political patterns
rapidly.
India was partitioned in 1947 on the basis that:
1. Muslims are not allowed by Allah to live with the
Hindus, who are kafirs. Thus, they projected the Two- Nation theory, which
claimed that the Muslims are a separate nation who are entitled to a large
chunk of India, which shall be the future homeland of all the Indian Muslims.
2. They put so much emphasis on total separation that
all the non-Muslims must leave the territories which were to constitute
Pakistan and seek settlement in India, and all Muslims would quit India to
become the citizens of Pakistan.
The country was partitioned on 14th August, 1947, and the
Hindus, along with their Sikh brethren left their homes in Pakistan under most
adverse circumstances but the Muslims did not, though they faced equally grim
conditions in India. They were saved by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, the greatest
Muslim leader, having a Hindu name, that India ever produced. Apparently, being
a Hindu patriot, he earned the title of "Mahatma." It was he who
intervened by exerting his enormous influence on the Hindus and thus stopped
them evicting the Muslims from India according to the terms of the Partition.
The Hindus of India, when pondering over this gigantic
Gandhian fallacy, will reaiise that:
1. Gandhi was a dictator who wore the most fascinating
spiritual robe. It is because he had no right to reverse the fundamental
principle for dividing India, that is, the Muslims nnust quit India because
they claimed to be a separate nation whose religion forbade them to live with
the Hindus.
2. Gandhi obviously thought of India as his personal
property, otherwise he could not have abused his influence to stop the Muslim
emigration. This folly of Gandhi, however, does not legitimise the stay of the
Muslims in India; when a person has been paid the price for his commodity, he
must hand it over to the buyer; the Muslims had sold their Indian rights of
citizenship in exchange for Pakistan. Gandhi had no mandate to nullify this
deal.
3. It also throws a serious aspersion on Gandhi's
character as a Hindu patriot. How could he show such a compassion for those,
who had expelled millions of Hindus from the lands that their forefathers had
occupied for the last ten thousand years, and which formed the fountain of
their faith and culture. These helpless men, women and children certainly
deserved precedence over the Muslims who were the sole cause of their
destruction and homeiessness.
4. Not only that, it also demonstrates the total
inaptitude of Gandhi as the Hindu leader, who failed to see the future Muslim
attitude towards what had been left of India; mercy to a wolf is cruelty to a
lamb. The people whose faith is based on the hatred of the Hindus, could not
be friendly to Hindustan, the motherland of the Hindus.
Again, this man knew nothing about the realities of life.
He was absolutely dedicated to ahimsa (non-violence) which is not only utterly
opposed to the Vedic principle of fighting for dharma but also completely
unnatural. Dignified living incessantly requires that one must defend oneself
against adverse situations. Thus ahimsa is simply a euphemism for cowardice. How
such a large nation as of the Hindus, could ever defend itself through ahimsa
which is a process of bowing, bending and buckling before an aggressor. In fact,
this man wrought psychological ruination of the Hindus in the guise of holiness.
These observations have an historical relevance to what
Baljit Rai has reported in his book under discussion.
Of the two threats that he has mentioned, the Illegal
Muslim migration into India is far more serious. The Proxy War in Kashmir will
eventually bankrupt Pakistan, announcing its total demise. On the contrary, it
is proving a good training ground for the Hindus, who have been dazed by the
fake brilliance of ahimsa.
Why is illegal Muslim migration from Bangladesh ruinous
to India?
A deeper study of the problem reveals that the illegal
Muslim migration into India is a form of the Islamic Jehad, which guarantees
paradise to Muslims in return for debilitating, damaging and destroying the
non-Muslims. Since the Prophet Muhammad declared war a form of deception, the
Bangladeshis do not have to take up arms against India. Any ruse or tactic which
may prove ruinous to India is a form of Jehad, and refreshing to the Muslim
souls. By drawing attentlon to the Bangladeshi infiltration, Mr. Baljit Rai has
discharged his patriotic duty handsomely. He states:
"Pressure of population in Bangladesh is so great
that at least 20 million (2 crore) Muslims have illegally infiltrated into
India. As a result of this massive illegal migration, ten districts of Assam
(out of 23) have become Muslim majority districts. In West-Bengal (India) almost
all the nine border districts except two or three have become Muslim majority or
near Muslim majcrity districts. In 56 constituencies of West Bengal Muslims have
a decisive voice."
Mr. Baljit Rai further emphasises the imminent dangers
of population explosion in Bangladesh when he states:
"Rate of growth of population in Bangladesh is so
high and fast that by the year 2017 ( according to a report of Government of
Bangladesh) its population would be 240 million (24 crorer). Where will they
live in a small country? There is not enough land and resources even for the
existing population."
To impart an idea of the pending population disaster,
which is likely to ruin India through illegal Bangladeshi infiltration, Baljit
Rai completes the picture when he says:
"Its ( Bangladesh's) density of population per
square mile is three times that of India which is 267. In area Bangladesh is
1/25 the size of India but in population it is 1/7th."
The real tragedy as depicted by Bajit Rai is not an
internal affair of Bangladesh. He advances an evincing argument when he adds:
"Bangladeshi Muslim infiltrators have demanded
second partition of India. This new country will be called 'Muslim Bango Bhoomi'
which will comprise large parts of West Bengal, Bihar, and Assam and finally
merged with Bangladesh."
This further truncation of India, which the Bangladeshi
Muslims seek through illegal infiltration, is quite compatible with the Islamic
concept of Jehad which has been more successful through sexuality than swords
and spears. This fact emerges clearly when we look at the North African
countries such as Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Algeria, etc. it needed only a few
thousand Arab warriors to conquer these lands where they set up huge harems,
usually having 100- 1000 native women, and occasionally a lot more. Thus,
initially one Arab could produce several hundred children, who would multiply
far more rapidly thereafter. This is how these conquered lands became "Arab
Countries" by suffering loss of national identity through total destruction
of language, culture and religion. It all happened with the consent of Allah who
sanctions polygamy, and unlimited concubinage in this world and promises hefty
number of most beautiful virgins and pretty boys in the next world as a reward
for destroying kafirs such as Hindus.
Now, one can see that the Muslim population explosion,
which has been called "Islamic demographic bomb" in the West, is not a
wild expression of sexual gratification but a sequence of the sexual philosophy
as propounded by the Prophet Muhammad. Hadith no. 137, vol 7 of Bokhari says
that some of the Mujahids ( the holy soldiers ) who had captured Kafir women,
practised coitus-interruptus with them, in case they became pregnant. When they
consulted the Prophet to find out his opinion about the correctness of their
behaviour, he expressed his surprise by saying, "Do you really do
that?" Repeating this question thrice, he remarked, "There is no soul
that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of
Resurrection."
In simple language, it means that whosoever is destined
to be born, shall be born. Therefore, it is evil to exercise birth control of
any kind. The hadith no. 718 of vol. 3, Bokhari also contains the same
statement. Again, the Koran holds practitoners of birth control as murderers.
(Children of Israel: 31 and Cattle: 141).
However, when we delve deeper, we find that behind this
sexual philosophy of Islam, lies the desire of Muhammad to be the greatest
prophet for having the largest number of followers:
" .... I hope that I will have the greatest
following on the Day of Resurrection." (SAHIH MUSLIM: 283)
Yet another hadith says that a good Muslim will make the
Prophet proud of him by increasing the number of his followers!
Instead of describing effects of the Muslim population
explosion on the world, I may restrict my comments to the contents of "Is
India Going Islamic?"
Before proceeding any further, I may remind the reader
once again that India was divided in 1947 on the principle:
1. The Muslims are a separate nation and being pure by
virtue of the Islamic faith, cannot live with the Hindus who are unclean for
being idolatrous.
2. All non-Muslims will leave Pakistan to settle in
India, and all Muslims of India will emigrate to Pakistan.
As Gandhi and Nehru had no mandate to reverse these
fundamental principles of partitions, the Muslim act of not emigrating to
Pakistan leads to the following undeniable conclusions:
a. By demanding partition of India, the Muslims
committed an act of high treason against their own motherland, and thus
forfeited their rights of citizenship.
b. The fact that they still want to live with the
Hindu "infidels," clearly demonstrates that they no longer hold them
"unclean, sordid and firewood of hell" as they did at the time of
Partition. This change of mind proves beyond a shadow of doubt that they have
given up Islam in principle.
These are the logical conclusions which cannot be defied
by reason. The Muslims of India, in fact, still have no patriotic loyalty to
this land, and they are staying there because they have nowhere to go. Pakistan
put up barriers against their entry in 1951. It shows that Muslims are not one
nation. It is just a juristic fraud which is further proved by the fact that
Pakistan is not willing to admit 225,000 Pakistanis of Bihari origin who
suffered tremendously for Pakistan during the war against India in 1971. This
deception of one-Muslim-nationhood is further exposed by the fact that these
poor Muslim Biharis have been rotting in the Bangladeshi camps as non-citizens
for the last two decades irrespective of the truth that thousands of them were
born on the Bangladeshi soil!
It is not just the massive illegal infiltration from
Bangladesh, which will ruin India, it is voting power of the immigrants which
will spell the doom of the Land of the Hindus. Realising the potency of the
Mujlim vote, Maulana Madni has just declared that if a common civil code is
introduced, every Muslim man must have four wives and produce 25 children.
There is only one solution to this horrendous problem,
that is, disfranchise all Muslims of India. A vote is the right of a patriotic
citizen who thinks good of his country and acts accordingly. These people lost
their Indian citizenship by dividing their own motherland to create Pakistan.
Giving a vote to an "uncitizen" is an insult to a citizen.
However, the voting right may be restored for those who
prove their loyalty for India over a period of time. This honour should also be
extended to their children.
I must point out that it takes courage to introduce
this type of patriotic measures. The Hindus, who have become accustomed to
ahimsa, are the most reluctant fighters. Encourage them to adopt their ancestral
Ksatriya ways: they must be prepared for the final battle, which is inevitable.
Is India Going Islamic? by Baljit Rai is
available from:
Voice of India
2/18 Ansari Road
New Delhi - 110002
INDIA
| 
Previous
Review
