Know Real Facts about Islam

Memorable Writings of
Anwar Shaikh

HOME

Author

Essays

Books

Reviews

Site Index

 

 

 

Table of Contents

 
Mystery
Free Will
Origin of Mysticism
Mysticism - The Universal Mystery
Buddhist Mysticism
Greek Mysticism
Semitic Mysticism
Christian Mysticism
Islamic Mysticism
Mysticism, the Vedic Legacy - Part 1
Mysticism, the Vedic Legacy - Part 2

 
E-mail this page Print this page

Sign GuestBook

Read GuestBook

 

Mysticism

Origin of Mysticism

by Anwar Shaikh

MYSTICISM

Man is a microcosm - the tiny replica of the universe, whose wonders seldom fail to surprise, stimulate and even stupefy. Of course, observation of the universal phenomenon is educating and liberating but its vastness can be equally bewildering, bamboozling and, baffling. Thus, direct observation of the cosmos may not offer a glimpse of the Reality that lurks behind it. The light approach, therefore, is to look into one's self - the microcosm. This is the message and technique of Mysticism, the personal quest for the Truth.

A lot has been said about the origins of Mysticism. Greece and Iran claim to be its fountain but when we delve into it deeper, we can see that its roots lie in India. The article captioned as "Origin of Mysticism" should provide a glory of India. It is simply because it shows that search for the truth began in this land.

ORIGIN OF MYSTICISM

Mysticism or the quest for the hidden truth that pervades the fabric of nature, is aroused by the mysterious projection of the universe. It is a labyrinth where lovers are lost and the real pleasure of existence lies in search for the beloved, which grows deeper and more interesting with rising hope and intensified desire.

As stated previously, it is alvvays for the lover to look for the beloved and do all the wooing. When a beloved becomes a wooer, he or she loses the status of the beloved. The true zest of love lies in the search which multiplies with the degree of sincerity, sobriety and strain involved in the exploration. Those who have had an experience of true love, know the value of sighs, sorrows and supplications suffused with selflessness, no matter how suffocating, suppressing and stifling the experience.

In the world of mysticism, it is the language of love that prevails, irrespective of, whether we indulge in the Indian Christian or Islamic mysticism. It is poetic in nature and packed with an emotional appeal bursting with desire, which appears erotic and demanding, yet in reality, it is pure and perfect carrying the pomp and prestige of ardent love which is ingenious, ingenuous and irrepressible. When we apply this list to the origin of mysticism, India stands out as the true home of mysticism because in the vedas, the Indian scriptures, it is man who woos God being inspired by the fear, reverence and wonder of nature. The other religions such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam have exactly the opposite approach. In these faiths, it is God who contacts man. An Indian mystic believes that the natural phenomenon i.e. the world of appearance is a veil between the Reality and man, the seeker, who must initiate a probe for Brahmin, the Reality, and he can trace Him through acquired and intuitive knowledge only. On the contrary, the Semitic religions hold that it is God who reveals Himself to man because He wants to be worshipped and desires to guide man; people who believe in Him are guided and saved but the unbelievers are thrown into hell. This philosophy clearly shows that:

    a. Relationship between God and man is not that of love because He forces himself on man through revelation.

    b. Man is not a lover but a slave who is required by divine command to obey and worship the Almighty.

    c. The fact that God reveals Himself and does not observe a veil cheapens Himself and thus divests Himself of the adoration that true love deserves.

    d. Again, as God destroys those who do not worship Him, the entire purpose of revelation and creation is the glorification of God, and man is just a pawn in the phenomenal game.

1. Exodus 3:4 clearly states about Moses that an angel of God appeared before him from a burning bush. It was an act of God's revelation, and He wanted to impress man (Moses) with His Divine power. Therefore, though the bush burnt, it was not consumed.

Exodus 4: 10-14 narrates yet another episode which states that Moses was reluctant to carry the burden of prophethood owing to not being eloquent because of defective speech. God argues with him ta accept the responsibility as His prophet: "Now, therefore go, and I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say." But when Moses still dithers, he does so at the risk of kindling God's wrath!

2. Though there is no mention of Trinity in the New Testament, this happens to be the basic belief of the Christians. Most Christians believe in Jesus not as God, the Son, but as God incarnate, meaning that he was God in the form of man.

The mere fact of his birth, growing and preaching constitutes an act of revelation. The desire of Jesus to be achnowledged as God was so strong that he was crucified on the charge of blasphemy though the faithful put on it an entirely different interpretation, which seeks to portray it as an act of salvation for the human race.

Jesus wanted to be loved by mankind: like Yahwe, the Jewish God, he appears as a jealous God because he does not 1ike the idea of people loving anybody else including one's father, mother, sons and daughters (Matt. 10: 37). In fact he goes even further, and demands that one must prove one's love for him by hating one's father, mother, wife, children, brothers, sisters and even one's life (Luke 14: 26).

It is rather strange: love is a natural trait and function of the lover, if he/she does not show an intense desire for the beloved voluntarily, one can assume with certainty that there is no spark of affection. Of course; it is unnatural, and even vulgar, to demand to be treated as a beloved along with the compliments that a true love deserves. Once God has revealed Himself, He has lost the status of a beloved. In fact, revelation is an act of a beloved chasing the "lover." I need not say what people think of such a beloved.

3. Islam also advocates the same divine approach, which clearly shows that God imposes Himself on man through revelation. Page 640 of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1971, describes an event in the life of the Prophet Muhammad, which has not been challenged by anyone in the Muslim world. It states that, according to Muhammad, the Word or God was revealed to him by the Archangel Gabriel. This luminous figure caught him by the throat and commanded him to repeat the sacred words but he tried to flee. Muhammad suspected the genuineness of his message and was afraid that the revelation resembled the claims of the visionary poets of his time who frequented the streets of Mecca with their pretence of being divinely illuminated.

However, this episode is more authoritatively stated on page 97 of the Hadith: Sahih Muslim (vol. one):

There came to him (Muhammad) the angel and said: Recite, to which he replied: I am not lettered. He took hold of me (the apostle said) and pressed me, till I was hard-pressed; thereafter, he let me off and said: Recite, to which I replied: I am not lettered. He took hold of me and pressed me for the third time, till I was hard pressed and then let me go and said: Recite in the name of your Lord who created you from a clot of blood. Recite. And your most bountiful Lord is He who taught the use of pen - taught what you knew not. Then the Prophet returned therewith, his heart was trembling, and he went to Khadaija and said: Wrap me up, wrap me up. So they wrapped him till the fear had left him.

This is an extraordinary event: God sends the archangel who uses violence on a human to act as his prophet for conveying His message to the people so that they should supplicate and prostrate before Him. Allah, like the Jewish and Christian Gods, not only wants the obedience of people but desperately desires to be worshipped. Though He repeatedly calls Himself kind and merciful, His extravagant threats of revenge, retribution and retaliation render His promises of care, clemency and compassion rather fragile. He always seems angry, threatening and even reviling the unbelievers. And when He is not indulging in the expression of fury, He seems to be bribing the faithful with the glorious comforts of paradise and the appetising sexual bounties of the most beautiful virgins who dwell here.

One an easily see that this approach is divorced from the basic concept of mysticism.

4. Though the Vedas are considered as the Holy Scriptures of the Hindus, I am reluctant to call them as such. To my mind, they are the sacred books of India and form an integral part of the cultural heritage of people of the Indian descent irrespective of their faith.

There are four Vedas, the oldest being the RgVeda, which also happens to be the root of the Vedic religion leading to its latest form known as Hinduism. The Veda is considered eternal. It is not subject to revelation; all god or gods had to do was to promote the intuition of the pious and gifted men known as Rishi or seers who were able to see the eternal truth directly without the help of any medium including sense perception. They expressed this truth in a human language called Sanskrit.

This is the claim of the Hindu faithful, and one may be willing to admire it without acknowledging its divine origin or supernatural element. Since there is a repeated mention of the Eternal Law in the Rg. Veda, one comes to the conclusion that the Vedic seers were deeply interested in the natural phenomena, and thought of the universe as an organised whole. Not only the SAT or the systematic cosmos was governed by order and truth called RTA but man himself was an inlegral part of the universe which was likely to suffer chaos (ASAT) through the interference of the demoniac powers or antigods (ASURAS). Man had thus an obligation to make a contribution towards the maintenance of the world, and he could do so by performing sacrifices and offering gods SOMA drink. The purpose of sacrifices, Soma and many complex rituals was to secure the propitiation of the hidden forces of nature, which influenced the quality of human life through their effect and intensity. As humans and animals have shapes and attributes which give them power to act and be nice or nasty, these forces of nature which had the ability to peel and heel, sadden and gladden and elevate and devastate, must also possess certain forms and characteristics. So, they gave these natural forces particular shapes usually human and sometimes animalic such as elephant, bull and monkey. One should also applaud the vision of the Vedic man who knew that the cosmic order is hierarchical. So, they stratified these forces of nature, creating gods and goddesses of various ranks having different powers and prestige. The greatest of them was Dyasuh-Pitar, Heavenly Father or the sky. Then there were Indra, the god of Indu or rain and dew, Agni, the god of fire, Surya, the Sun, Usha the goddess of the dawn, and many more. So these hidden forces ascended the human mind with mystical attributes and powers.

One ought to remember that these forces are part of the universe which is mysterious and arouses fear in man's heart. Thus, he seeks protection against this natural consternation through a set of rituals, supplications and sacrifices, which eventually emerge as a religion; it seeks to protect the human mind from fear of the cosmic vastness, mystery and uncertainty the same way as the ozone layer shields the earth from the lethal effects of the sun's ultraviolet rays. Because of its survival value, religion comes to be associated with man's instinct and almost all his actions become reflexive in relation to the next world and he usually defies reason to protect the faith, which is, in fact, a form of make-believe; he does not want to be shaken out of his daydreaming to face the reality of life which is harsh, hazardous and even horrendous, though capable of moulding into hilarity, happiness and even a halo, but it requires a lot of effort, which he is reluctant to put in. Why? It is because religion offers him the earth just for having faith in a certain guru, prophet or messiah. Why should he suffer pain for what he call get gratis?

Since the Veda is inspired by the mystical fear of the universe seeking peace of mind through appeasing the forces of nature including the supreme God, it represents man's spontaneous desire, and not dictated by a super-being. to mount a search for the hidden truth through meditation and rituals. This is the reason that throughout the hymns of the Rg. Veda, one cannot trace a single stanza where a god tells man to supplicate him, bow, bend or prostrate before him, worship him. Whatever rituals or forms or worship man adopts, he does so of his own free will, without any divine coercion, whatever. The Veda, thus, represents man's natural curiosity to find the Reality with a view to becoming a part of it. Of course, this situation changes with the emergence of the Orthodox Hinduism because Lord Krishna wants to be worshipped by his devotees but I am concerned here with Vedism though Hinduism still preserves some of its original traits.

Since the Vedic quest for reality is initiated by man of his own free will, it gives him the status of a lover and bestows on God the honour of being the beloved, seeking union with Him. And this has been the fundamental principle of mysticism since inception of civilisation. On the contrary, the approach of the Semitic religions, as already described, is entirely the opposite: it is God who threatens man with hell or coaxes him with the offer of paradise to seek Him and thus loses the status of a beloved which constitutes the core of mysticism. This is the reason that the Biblical and Koranic messages commence wilh a command such as "say..," that is, God orders a man called "prophet," in a vision or through an angel to say this or that to the people as the Will of God. Thus, their approach is revelatory because God comes to man so that he should love and obey Him; it disqualifies Him as the beloved, the object of search. Therefore, it is only Hinduism which rises as the source of mysticism whereby it is man who seeks God voluntarily.

Yet another reason why mysticism cannot form part of Judaism, Christianity or Islam is the fact that these religions believe in a creator God, whose relationship with man is that of his Maker. Therefore, man is nothing but God's servant or slave, whose destiny it is to cry, creep and crawl before Him as a worshipper, begging His mercy.

Again, the Semitic religion such as Islam declares that the ultimate goal of man is to enter paradise to enjoy physical delights such as beautiful surroundings, delicious food, wine and women. Similarly, Judaism and Christianity have their ideas of salvation; they treat man as God's creature, dependent on His grace forever. It is only the Vedic attitude incorporated by Hinduism, which seeks union with God.

Before I narrate the basic points of mysticism, which are an integral part of Hinduism, I ought to say a few words about the composition of the Vedas:

Though Western scholars agree to accord the Vedas an antiquity stretching back to 1500 B.C., it is somewhat a begrudging assessment, and emanates from the fact that the Hindu culture has lost its dominant aspect over the last 1000 years. The antiquity of the Vedas can be stretched back another thousand years, if not more.

Besides the Rg. Veda, which is the original work, there are other three volumes known as Yajur, Sama and Atharva. The Rg. Veda was composed in the Punjab where Sanskrit was developed as the sacred language of the Vedas as well as the vehicle of the literary expression. It is in Sanskrit that the roots and shoots of such languages as Greek, Latin, Kelt, Tuton and Slovonian lie. Even the deities of these lands their myths, religious beliefs and practices have a good deal in common with the Vedic traditions of thought and action.

This point is so significant that not only comparative religious but also cultural history of the world, and especially the West, cannot be understood without them. Though there is a host of evidence to show that Sanskrit has a precedence over the classical languages of the West, such as Greek and Latin, the western scholars do not acknowledge it as the mother of these tongues, and claim that Sanskrit was a sister of the language they term as the ''Indo-European." It is strange that Sanskrit is as live and kicking even today as it ever was, but there is no trace of the Indo-European. The same remarks apply to the original homeland of the Aryans who developed the Sanskrit language. The Rg. Veda does not mention a word about the foreign origin of the Aryans but repeatedly narrates the glory of the Punjab, their true home. When we consider that it is the Punjab that has the honour to populate most of the Indian sub-continent and to bless these provinces with its Vedic culture, it is not difficult to imagine that the Europeans emigrated from those parts of Asia, once called the Punjab, and not the Russian Steppe.

Mysticism as depicted by the Rg. Veda, unmistakably shows the following features:

1. Mysticism is not a revealed religion but inspired by the mysterious nature of the universe. This fact is described in hymn CXXXIX of creation:

This hymn clearly states that originally there was neither being nor nonbeing; nor air, nor sky .. There was total darkness, and this All was concealed in chaos.

There was only a void and formlessness, and it was the great power of Warmth which led to the birth of unit (i.e. primitive order).

The existent comes out of the non existent, and this is the relationship between being and non being, and was motivated by Desire.

There were mighty forces and their action on "the energy up yonder" which brought order to chaos and gave it form.

One ought to realise that the sage who composed this hymn starts it with speculative questions: what was air and sky covered in? What gave shelter, and was water there and was it unfathomed?

Considering that this hymn was written 1500 - 2500 B.C., it is marvellous to be scientific in all proportions: it clearly states:

    a. All was covered in darkness, that is, entire natural phenomenon is of the same origin, hence the principle of monism;

    b. the second stunning corollary of the speculative hymn is that existence comes out of nothingness;

    c. the third point is that existence is brought about by the action of natural forces on matter i.e. "the energy beyond up yonder;"

    d. in the beginning, there is chaos, which is turned into the natural phenomenon that presents order, and

    e. behind all this was the great power of warmth, which one may interpret as heat.

However, the kernel of this discussion is that the sage does not pretend that what he says is the revealed message; it is inspired by the wonder and mystery of this universe, and as in the beginning of the hymn, he remains equally astonished in the end:
    ".. who knows then whence it (the universe) came into being?
He the first origin of this creation, whether he formed it all or did not form it, whose eye controls this cosmos in the loftiest heaven, he truly knows it, or perhaps he knows not."

2. It is man's instinctive search for the truth, hidden behind the universe, which has been incorporated by Hinduism in its original philosophy. This Indian religion propounds that behind the natural phenomenon, is a principle which is uncreated, eternal, infinite, transcendent and all-embracing. It comprises both being and non-being. This is the sole reality which is not only the ultimate cause and source of all existence but also its final goal. This reality is called Brahman; He is the all, that is, the occult and the visible, over and under; He is not the creator but causes the universe and all that is in it to emanate from Himself.

    a. Thus Brahman is in all things and is the self (Atman) of all living things. Brahman who creates everything out of Himself, also is the preserver, transformer and absorber of everything.

    b. The fact that the First Principle, Brahman or God is in everything and everything comes out of Him, gave birth to the famous Indian philosophy described as the "One in All, and All in One." which the Greeks, the Jews and the Arabs adopted as: "Unity in diversity and diversity in unity." This is monism which is considered as the universal principle of mysticism.

3. As everything comes out of God and goes back into Him in alternate cycles of evolution and devolution, man's true goal is to seek union with God. This has also become a major doctrine of mysticism.

Communion with God is also an Indian innovation of a later date which emerged with the Bhagavad Gita, requiring man to love and worship God and seek nearness of Him. Though this has also become an integral part of mysticism, it is not compatible with the Vedic spirit, which happens to be union with God i.e. becoming a part of Him.

4. The hymn XCI of book 10, known as Purusasukta is a further statement of the fact that the world is monistic in nature and emphasises that the cosmos is not a machine but an organism. If it were not so, man and matter could not form a part of God to make the universe various aspects of the Reality.

Everything on the earth, the sky, the moon, the sun, and even the gods such as Indra, Agni, and Vayu, came into being from the sacrifice of a person called Purusa, having a thousand heads, a thousand eyes and thousand feet.

Delightful though it is to note that this hymn is based on a scientific observation of the universe which diagnoses the oneness of existence, thus enabling man to reach the highest possible point of development, that is, to become a part of Godhead through union with the suprerne, deplorable it equally is because it lays down the foundation of Caste System, treating certain people such as Brahmin and Ksatriya as superior just by virtue of birth, and other such as Vaisya and Sudra as inferior, and even unclean, just by nativity.

Thuugh the Hindus have treated Samsara or transmigration of souls through Caste System as the vehicle of salvation i.e. the union of man with God, one can ignore it completeJy; the oneness of the universe is a sufficiently strong medium to unite man with God.

5. Another major point of the Vedic mysticism is the fact that though God is man's superior, the relationship between the two is not that of a master and a slave. The hymn LXXXIX known as Visvadevas clearly states:

    "The friendship of the Gods have we devoutly sought."
This Vedic approach is taken much further in verses 3 to 6 of hymn LXXXVIII, dedicated to VARUNA. It says that the worshipper has lost the old favour that he once had of the god, yet he is bold enough to remind the deity:
    "What hath become of those our ancient friendships, which without ... we walked together."
The relationship between God and man is that of friendship. Another point this hymn stresses is that man originally belonged to the realm of God, and has been separated from Him. It is this doctrine that appears as the focus of metempsychosis in the systems of Pythagoras, Plato Gnosticism, and Manechaeism.

6. Meditation through recitation of a particular word which has the mystical power to reform man's inner vision for making his union with God a possibility, is a peculiarity or the Vedic mysticism; to the Hindus and Sikhs it is "Japp," which is called Dhikr in Islam; people of other faiths have their own synonyms for this word, yet the basic principle is essentially Vedic.

    "Simply, ye Mighty Ones, I ask the Gods of that wondrous oblation hallowed by the mystic word." (Hymn CXX - Asvins, Book One).
Again, hymn CLXIV says:
    "upon what syllable of holy praise - song, as I were their highest heaven, the Gods repose them, who knows not this, what will he do with praise - song? But they who know it will sit here assembled."
Originally, "Vasat" was the mystical word in making an oblation to a god with fire. This word had to be used with the utmost accuracy. otherwise, the priest was sure to suffer the most deadly consequences of his error.

However, the greatest mystical word of the Hindus is OM, which is not only sacred to them but also discloses the nature of mysticism itself. It implies that as God is the self in everything, everything serves as the divine symbol which represents His power, pomp and prestige. Of course, a symbol is nothing in itself because its true significance lies in what it represents or stands behind it. It is like a word which has a meaning, it is a flower which has fragrance and it is a magnet which has hidden attractive power. This fact is well illustrated by "OM" itself. It is a sanskrit word composed of three sounds: a-u-m. The vowels a and u merge into one another to become o. The mystical approach of Om represents several important articles of the Hindu faith such as the three major Hindu gods, Brahma, Visnu and Siva, the three Vedic scriptures, Rg. Yajur and Sama, the three worlds of earth, atmosphere and heaven, and so on. In fact, Om represents the mystical essence of the entire universe. This word is frequently used in the Buddhist and Jaina rituals as well as in the practice of yoga and the related techniques of auditory meditation.

The mystical representation by words and syllables is also found in the Koran, the Islamic scripture. It commences with the letters Alif, Lam, Mem which are supposed to have a mystical meaning. "Allah-Hoo" is as significant a word in Islam as Om is in Hinduism. Its frequent recitation or Dhikr is held as the key to salvation, and it is for this reason that it is considered: "Isme-Azam."

This symbolic approach of mysticism is at the root of arts and literature. For example, the written notes are not music but a set of musical cues for the creation of the tones to be produced by the various instruments. Similarly the medium of literature is words but not as abstract entities conceived in the mind but words as spoken or written.

The final stage in the tradition of the Veda is represented by what is called Vedanta i.e. conclusion of the Veda. This tradition is explained by a vast body of prose and verse rich in speculative elaborations. It is contained in the Upanishad and dates back to 800 B.C. or earlier. This is the fountain of the later Indian philosophy, which itself originated from the Rg. Veda.

Mystical speculation is the special concern of the Upanishads which though gave India a philosophical edge over the rest of mankind, arrested its secular march by creating an observation with the world-to-come and reducing man's role in making this life pleasant, prestigious and praiseworthy. The Hindu concern with the purification of self as a preparation for the other worldliness has imposed a heavy penalty on the Indian way of life.

The Indian wisdom, as it is quite clear from the study of these Upanishads, directed itself with complete devotion, dedication and a sacred sense of duty to the path of Reality; it developed:

    a. the concept of a single, supreme being, and

    b. emphasised that man needs knowledge to discover the Supreme Being and to be able to unite with Him.

    c. Though monism had always been the message of the Vedas, through discussion, demonstration and dissemination, the Hindu seers made it a public knowledge that Brahman and self, orGod and soul are one in essence. Since everything has a self which is an extension of God, the diversity of forms, constituting this universe, represents a single unity which gave birth to the universal principle: "One in all and all in One."

To a Hindu mystic, reality is one. The manifoldness of forms is iust an appearance:
    "There is on earthy no diversity. He gets death after death, who perceives here seeming diversity. As a unity only is it to be looked upon - This indemonstrable, endurable Being."
    (Brih. 4.4.19-20)

    Again Chand. 7.26.2. states:

    " The seer sees not death, Nor sickness, nor any distress. The seer sees only the All, Obtains the All entirely."

The Indian philosophy of monism, that is, one in all and all in one, surely holds up the dignity of man. It attaches a negative value to worship or the acts of sacrifice:
    "This that people say "Worship this god! Worship that god."

    "And he himself is all the gods" (Brih. 1.4.6)
    so whoever worships another divinity (than his self),
    He is one and I another, "is not aware of the truth
    "An individual man may become Brahma (God) by knowing
    himself to be such" (Brih. 1.4.15)

As a matter of interest, I should also mention that Upanishads represent the opposite points of view as well, and thus show the independence and originality of the Indian thinking:

1. To a student of Upanishad, knowledge does not mean "much learning" but the comprehension of the cosmic truth. It is the sole vehicle of discovering the Reality and is directly opposed to the Semitc device of revelation which means that God approaches man to reveal Himself.

In fact, there exists in Upanishads the doctrine or Prasada or Grace, found in Katha 2.20 as well as SVet 3.20. It means that man needs God's grace to achieve salvation or immortality. Svet 1.6. states:

    "In this Brahma - wheel (universe) the soul flutters about, thinking that itself and the Actuator (God) are different, when favoured by Him, it (soul) attains immortality."
Katha 2.23 (= Mund 3.2.3) goes even fulther to negate the doctrine of knowledge and holds out the doctrine of election:
 
 
    "This soul is not to be obtained by instructions,
    not by intellect, nor by much learning.
    He is to be obtained only by the One whom He chooses.
    To such a one that Soul reveals his own person."
It is rather stunning that the concepts of Grace and Election which were to form the basic doctrines of Christianity and Islam centuries later, were developed in India as part of the mystical system.

Having said that I should emphasise that the doctrine of knowledge remains the true mystical Vedic approach. Though I have already propounded it in my own way, I may now explain it as Shankra, the celebrated Indian philosopher did, centuries earlier:

The concept of Maya is to be found in the Rg. Veda 6.47.18, where it means ''supernatural powers or artifices" which imply the antithesis of reality; this is the origin of the vedic doctrine of Maya: it means that the real Brahma or God is the undifferenced unity but the natural phenomena which appear as self-subsistent entities, are unreal and result from a person's own igrorance or Avidya which projects the things or one's own sense as the ultimate being of the world. However, this ignorance can be remedied through knowledge. This is what gave birth to the celebrated Indian theory of Cosmic illusion which served as the basis of the Platonic theory of Forms and an essential pillar of the international mysticism.

Svet 4. 9-10 describes this fact which became the Maya doctrine of the Upanishads:

    "This whole world the illusion-maker projects out of this
    (Brahma). And in it by illusion the other is confined.
    Now one should know that Nature is illusion.
    And that the Mighty Lord is the illusion-maker."
Shankra stated the theory of Maya much more forcefully. He held the world does not exist of itself but is derived from Brahman (God) and depends on Him for its existence. Therefore, it is not an illusion but less real. It is a Maya, a phenomenal appearance, partly created by our own imagination; it expresses our inability to see the world without being an expression of cause and change. It shows man's innate limitation which is termed as Avidya or ignorance. Because of this Maya, the intellect assumes that it knows the real. The world is only one Being but through Maya (Avidya) appears as multiplicity of forms and a process of flux. Change is just a name for superficial fluctuation of forms. Behind this Maya, forms and vicissitudes, lies the Reality that can be reached not by sensation but through insight gained by knowledge. This ultimate Reality is Brahman (God).

Since God is in all, the Self or Atman (soul) or everything is a part of God. It is shared by us and everything else; the undivided Self of things, which happens to be omnipresent, is identical with Brahman, who is neuter and above all human attributes, desire and ends.

Shankra, a great mystic, set the goal of mystiism. He believed that destination of philosophy is to discover the secret behind the universe, and the ultimate goal of every seeker is to lose himself into this secret. This is what Moslems call "Fana-Fe-Allah" and other remember it as union with God. This is the stage of existence where there is no misery, no death. It is a state ot Ananda, the blissful peace but it cannot be achieved unless a man not only renounces the world but also himself.

It is basically the Indian Mysticism which has been practised in various forms throughout the world as:

Mysticism is the product of India though this fact has not been acknowledged fully owing to ignorance and bigotry. The above mentioned forms of mysticism are likely to establish their origin and also demonstrate that being a search for the hidden truth, mysticism is man's true religion.
 
 
Previous ArticlePrevious Essay

 

Mysticism

 

Home   |   Essays   |  Books to Order  
© 2008 Islam Review and Anwar Shaikh. All rights reserved
No portion of this
site may be reproduced without written permission of publisher.